The Board Passed the Following Resolutions at Its Meeting July 20
Policy Ensuring Equal Treatment Admissions (SP-1)
WHEREAS, Governor Pete Wilson, on June 1, 1995, issued Executive Order W-124-95 to "End Preferential Treatment and to Promote Individual Opportunity Based on Merit," and
WHEREAS, paragraph seven of that order requests the University of California to "take all necessary action to comply with the intent and the requirements of this executive order," and
WHEREAS, in January 1995, the university initiated a review of its policies and practices, the results of which support many of the findings and conclusions of Governor Wilson, and
WHEREAS, the University of California Board of Regents believes that it is in the best interest of the university to take relevant actions to develop and support programs which will have the effect of increasing the eligibility rate of groups which are "underrepresented" in the university's pool of applicants as compared to their percentages in California's graduating high school classes and to which reference is made in Section 4,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The president, with the consultation of the Board of Regents, shall appoint a task force representative of the business community, the university, other segments of education and organizations currently engaged in academic "outreach." The responsibility of this group shall be to develop proposals for new directions and increased funding for the Board of Regents to increase the eligibility rate of those currently identified in section four. The final report of this task force shall be presented to the Board of Regents within six months after its creation.
Section 2. Effective January 1, 1997, the University of California shall not use race, religion, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin as a criterion for admission to the university or to any program of study.
Section 3. Effective January 1, 1997, race, religion, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin shall not be a criterion for admissions in exception to UC eligibility requirements.
Section 4. The president shall confer with the Academic Senate of the University of California to develop supplemental criteria for consideration by the Board of Regents which shall be consistent with section one. In developing such criteria, which shall provide reasonable assurances that the applicant will successfully complete his or her course of study, consideration shall be given to individuals who, despite having suffered disadvantage economically or in terms of their social environment (such as an abusive or otherwise dysfunctional home or a neighborhood of unwholesome or antisocial influences), have nonetheless demonstrated sufficient character and determination in overcoming obstacles to warrant confidence that the applicant can pursue a course of study to successful completion, provided that any student admitted under this section must be academically eligible for admission.
Section 5. Effective January 1, 1997, not less than fifty (50) percent and not more than seventy-five (75) percent of any entering class on any campus shall be admitted solely on the basis of academic achievement.
Section 6. Nothing in section one shall prohibit any action which is strictly necessary to establish or maintain eligibility for any federal or state program, where ineligibility would result in a loss of federal or state funds to the university.
Section 7. Nothing in section one shall prohibit the university from taking appropriate action to remedy specific, documented cases of discrimination by the university, provided that such actions are expressly and specifically approved by the Board of Regents or taken pursuant to a final order of a court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction.
Section 8. The president of the university shall periodically report to the Board of Regents detailing progress to implement the provisions of this resolution.
Section 9. Believing California's diversity to be an asset, we adopt this statement: Because individual members of all of California's diverse races have the intelligence and capacity to succeed at the University of California, this policy will achieve a UC population that reflects this state's diversity through the preparation and empowerment of all students in this state to succeed rather than through a system of artificial preferences.
Vote on SP1:
Voting Aye: Regents Burgener, Campbell, Clark, Connerly, Davies, del Junco, Johnson, Khachigian, Kolligian, Leach, Lee, Nakashima, Watkins and Wilson (14)
Voting No: Regents Brophy, Carmona, Davis, Eastin, Gomez, Gonzales, Levin, Montoya, Peltason and Sayles (10)
Abstaining: Regent Bagley
Policy Ensuring Equal Treatment Business Practices and Employment (SP-2)
WHEREAS, Governor Pete Wilson, on June 1, 1995, issued Executive Order W-124-95 to "End Preferential Treatment and to Promote Individual Opportunity Based on Merit," and
WHEREAS, paragraph seven of that order requests the University of California to "take all necessary action to comply with the intent and the requirements of this executive order," and
WHEREAS, in January 1995 the university initiated a review of its policies and practices, the results of which support many of the findings and conclusions of Governor Wilson,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Effective Jan. 1, 1996, the University of California shall not use race, religion, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin as a criterion in its employment and contracting practices.
Section 2. The president of the University of California is directed to oversee a system-wide evaluation of the university's hiring and contracting practices to identify what actions need to be taken to ensure that all persons have equal access to job competitions, contracts and other business and employment opportunities of the university. A report and recommendations to accomplish this objective shall be presented to the Board of Regents before Dec. 31, 1996.
Section 3. Nothing in section one shall prohibit any action which is strictly necessary to establish or maintain eligibility for any federal or state program, where ineligibility would result in a loss of federal or state funds to the university.
Section 4. Nothing in section one shall prohibit the university from taking appropriate action to remedy specific, documented cases of discrimination by the university, provided that such actions are expressly and specifically approved by the Board of Regents or taken pursuant to a final order of a court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction.
Vote on SP2:
Voting Aye: Regents Burgener, Campbell, Clark, Connerly, Davies, del Junco, Johnson, Khachigian, Kolligian, Leach, Lee, Montoya, Nakashima, Watkins and Wilson (15)
Voting No: Regents Bagley, Brophy, Carmona, Davis, Eastin, Gomez, Gonzales, Levin, Peltason and Sayles (10)