Berkeleyan Masthead

This Week's Stories

Public Affairs' New Leader Brings Extensive Background

Boomtown Scars -- Then and Now

Profile: Ergonomics Specialist Mallory Lynch

Cooperative Theme House Provides Support, Eases Housing Crunch

Modern Custody Disputes and Child Welfare

Teen Crime: Myths and Facts

Photo: Body Work

Nobel Prize-Winner Presents Passionate Poetry and Prose

Berdahl Takes Campus Agenda to State Capitol

Photo: Powerful Pair

Japanese Foreign Affairs Official Visits Berkeley

Tamara Keith: Have I Gotten Boring Already?

Regular Features

Campus Memos

Letters to the Editor

News Briefs


Staff Enrichment


Boomtown Scars -- Then and Now
Geographer Draws Parallels Between 19th Century Mining Towns and Silicon Valley's "Golden Triangle"

By Robert Sanders, Public Affairs
Posted January 27, 1999

A campus expert on mining in the American West sees a strong parallel between mining boomtowns that sprang up throughout California and the West in the 1800s and today's Silicon Valley.

"When I look at Silicon Valley I see a typical mining landscape," said Gray Brechin, an architectural historian and geographer, in a Jan. 22 session at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Anaheim, Calif. "I see the same sort of development with little planning or sense of civic responsibility.

"Like mining towns in the 1800s, Silicon Valley is characterized by a boom/bust economy heavily dependent on energy and technology," he argued. "And it is populated by transients with no commitment to the place, which has few amenities anyway.

"The result is all sorts of environmental problems, plus a large but hidden level of poverty. This is like Virginia City, Nev., where there was a great divide between the mine operators who lived on the hill and the workers who lived below."

As an architectural historian, Brechin is particularly offended by buildings in Silicon Valley. He noted that author Norman Mailer once called Silicon Valley "one of the ugliest places I've ever visited."

Brechin drew these parallels in a talk about the environmental costs of silver mining in the West in the 1800s, part of an AAAS session entitled "California 150 Years After the Gold Rush."

The Ciriacy-Wantrup postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Geography, Brechin has studied mining throughout the West, particularly its influence on the development of San Francisco. In a book due out in May, "Imperial San Francisco: Urban Power, Earthly Ruin" (University of California Press), he documents the rise and fall of fortunes in the city as a result of the Gold Rush and subsequent silver boom.

"Much of the gold left California to pay Eastern and European investors," Brechin said. "Only after the discovery of silver in the Comstock Lode in 1859 did the city's banks and fortunes take off."

While a few men made and lost immense fortunes, he noted, thousands of others toiled in poverty or lost their savings in speculative investments in the San Francisco mining exchange.

The mining itself left scars throughout the West. Mountains were reduced to muddy streams by hydraulic mining, once-teeming salmon streams were destroyed by mining runoff, and toxic metals still leach from mine tailings throughout the state.

To provide timber for the mines of the Comstock Lode in Virginia City and to fuel the smelting, the eastern slope of the Sierra Nevada was denuded of trees. The forests around Lake Tahoe were completely logged off, Brechin noted.

Because the silver was extracted by amalgamation, the mines also needed a steady supply of mercury. That was provided by the world's second largest mercury mine, near San Jose. Runoff from that mine left San Francisco Bay so heavily contaminated with mercury that dredging is often prohibited.

When the silver finally played out in 1878, Virginia City was largely abandoned. But its legacy lives on.

"Technical innovations spurred by the Gold Rush and by the subsequent discovery of silver in Nevada ultimately led to Silicon Valley, which editorial and business writers often point to as emblematic of California success," Brechin said.

"Having witnessed the unreflective violence with which speculators transformed the Santa Clara Valley into the home of the microchip," he added, "I agree that the Gold Rush lives on in the valley of silicon, but more as a tragic omen of what is in store for California and the West."

Brechin and photographer Robert Dawson focus on the cost of California's success in a new book, "Farewell, Promised Land: Waking From the California Dream," due out in March from the University of California Press.

"Mining concentrates funds in a few hands but leaves a great deal of poverty," Brechin said. "The true costs -- environmental damage, the costs of remediation and the social damage -- have often remained hidden."

Without a doubt mining has had a huge impact throughout history, influencing the rise of urbanization and of warfare, Brechin said. He is now researching the role of mining in Europe's emergence from the Dark Ages.


January 27 - February 2, 1999 (Volume 27, Number 20)
Copyright 1999, The Regents of the University of California.
Produced and maintained by the Office of Public Affairs at UC Berkeley.
Comments? E-mail