|
|||||||
Learning the ropes
By Diane Ainsworth, Public Affairs
03 October 2001
|
Learning to be an effective chair or dean isn’t an easy task. From obtaining a grant to investigating faculty compensation, handling a possible conflict of interest or recruiting a new faculty member, the job is bound to send any newcomer into unexplored territory. Filling the shoes of a department chair or dean can be lonely, admitted Karen De Valois, who is beginning her fourth year as chair of the psychology department. Part of the retreat was designed to encourage new administrators to meet their 80-plus counterparts on campus and ask questions. Invaluable experience The first day for new chairs and deans was devoted to topics such as academic personnel and case preparation, employment search training and the ins and outs of being an effective chair or dean, said Charles Upshaw, chief of staff in the executive vice chancellor and provost’s office. Continuing chairs and deans joined the group on the second day for discussions of additional topics, such as faculty compensation, graduate student recruitment, fundraising, media relations, government affairs and tenure appraisals. Learning the ropes Search training was particularly valuable, de Vries noted. “We went over the role of outreach and ways of effectively soliciting candidates to ensure that there is a rich, qualified applicant pool for faculty positions.” Two tough issues Berkeley faces in recruiting faculty are the high cost of housing in the Bay Area and difficulty matching the salaries of competing universities. “We discussed some of the fairly common situations, such as when a candidate for a junior faculty position tells us he or she has received a better offer from one of our competing institutions, and what options might be available in our rank-and-step system to address those realities,” de Vries said. “Special housing programs, some of which are new to freshly hired Berkeley faculty, were the topic of another discussion…that information is so critical to the outcome of a prospective faculty candidate’s decision,” de Vries said. “Until I became a new chair, I had a myopic view of faculty compensation,” said Arup Chakraborty, new chair of the chemical engineering department. “The retreat was very beneficial in giving me a new perspective on how ranking faculty members move up.” Indeed, a rewarding part of the position is “being able to make someone’s life better,” De Valois said. But there are hidden stresses in the job, too, including turning down faculty ideas or requests for support, she said, often a tricky situation to manage. “Sometimes we have to say no,” said De Valois. “Somebody may have the greatest piece of equipment ever, and think the department should buy it, but we might not be able to afford it. That’s not always the easiest situation to deal with. “Sometimes it can be lonely at the top, and it’s important that chairs and deans find someone in whom they can confide who will respect confidentiality,” she said.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Home | Search | Archive | About | Contact | More News Copyright 2000, The Regents of the University of California. Produced and maintained by the Office of Public Affairs at UC Berkeley. Comments? E-mail berkeleyan@pa.urel.berkeley.edu. |